Abstract Listings 2024

Primary orbital lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma: a case series and literature review

Author: Mingshen MA
Base Hospital / Institution: Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University; Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Stanford University; Gies College of Business, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

Rapid fire oral presentation

Abstract ID: 24-174

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to analyze the clinical characteristics and prognosis of primary orbital LELC.


Methods

This study involved a retrospective analysis and comprehensive review of electronic medical records and relevant literature.


Results

19 cases of primary orbital LELC were examined, including 6 patients enrolled from Beijing Tongren Eye Center and 13 cases reported in the literature. Unilateral disease was common, and the main disease sites were the dacryocyst in seven cases (36.8%) and the lacrimal gland in six (31.6%). Chief clinical manifestations were eyelid swelling, protrusion, tearing and conjunctival edema. Eight patients underwent surgery + radiotherapy (RT), three underwent surgery alone, four underwent surgery + RT + chemotherapy (CT), one underwent surgery + 125I + CT + RT, one underwent surgery + RT + CT + biotherapy, one underwent surgery + CT, and one underwent orbital-content enucleation + RT. Two patients were lost to follow-up; of the remainder, 15 patients had no recurrence and metastasis, 1 had recurrence in situ due to rejection of RT, and 1 had no recurrence in situ but had metastasis of the submandibular gland. The 3-year recurrence-free survival rate was 86.2%.


Conclusion

Orbital LELC is a rare malignant epithelial tumor that is correlated with EBV infection. Surgical excision combined with RT and CT is an optimal treatment that offered most patients good prognoses.


Additional Authors

First name Last name Base Hospital / Institution
Jing Li Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University; Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Stanford University; Gies College of Business, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Qihan Guo Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University; Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Stanford University; Gies College of Business, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Rui Liu Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University; Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Stanford University; Gies College of Business, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Qinghong Xie Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University; Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Stanford University; Gies College of Business, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Hang Yang Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University; Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Stanford University; Gies College of Business, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Fuxiao Luan Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University; Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Stanford University; Gies College of Business, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Tingting Ren Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University; Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Stanford University; Gies College of Business, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Hong Zhang Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University; Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Stanford University; Gies College of Business, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Jianmin Ma Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University; Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Stanford University; Gies College of Business, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Yong Tao Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University

↑ Back to top