Abstract ID: 26-533
Digital Analysis of Artificial Intelligence-Generated Blepharoplasty Simulations: The Role of Prompt Engineering
Author: MEHMET ŞAHİN Base Hospital / Institution: Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University
Presentation Type: Rapid Fire Presentation Session: Eyelid Surgery & TumorsDate: 12th SeptemberTime: 08.54AM
Purpose
To evaluate the predictive accuracy of ChatGPT-generated upper blepharoplasty simulations and investigate the effect of prompt specificity on quantitative periocular morphometric accuracy.
Methods
Thirty patients (60 eyes) who underwent isolated upper blepharoplasty were included. Standardized preoperative and 6-month postoperative photographs were analyzed. Preoperative photographs were processed using ChatGPT Pro to generate two simulation models: (1) general AI-generated prediction and (2) anatomically constrained prediction preserving margin reflex distance (MRD)1, MRD2, and palpebral fissure height (PFH). Quantitative eyelid measurements were performed using ImageJ software, including MRD1, MRD2, PFH, pretarsal show (PTS), and mid-pupillary lid crease distance (MPLCD), defined as the distance between the corneal light reflex and upper eyelid crease measured at the 15° to165° meridians.Quantitative results obtained from both AI-generated prediction models were compared with real postoperative photographs.
Results
Preoperative MRD1, MRD2, PFH, and PTS values were 2.71±0.7 mm, 5.28±0.6 mm, 8.02±0.8 mm, and 1.95±1.3 mm, compared with postoperative values of 2.74±0.7 mm, 5.31±0.9 mm, 8.03±1.2 mm, and 3.24±1.5 mm. Significant postoperative changes were observed only in pretarsal show and MPLCD measurements (p≤0.05).
Compared with real postoperative photographs, the general AI prediction group demonstrated significant differences in MRD1 (3.40±0.6 mm, p≤0.001), MRD2 (5.99±0.4 mm, p≤0.001), PFH (9.39±0.7 mm, p≤0.001), and all MPLCD measurements (p≤0.001), whereas PTS (2.97±1.2 mm, p=0.11) remained comparable. In contrast, the anatomically constrained prediction group showed quantitatively comparable results with real postoperative photographs (p≥0.05).
Conclusion
General AI-generated simulations tended to standardize periocular anatomy, whereas anatomically constrained prompts produced realistic postoperative predictions. Prompt engineering appears critical for accurate AI-based surgical visualization and avoidance of unrealistic patient expectations.
Additional Authors
| First name | Last name | Base Hospital / Institution |
|---|---|---|
| NİSA | AKIN | Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University |
| SERDAR | BİLİCİ | Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University |
| SUAT HAYRİ | UĞURBAŞ | Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University |
